At a duly convened meeting of the District Judges of Nueces County, Texas, held on December 13, 2001, said Judges by majority vote duly recorded in the minutes of the meeting adopted these additional Local Rules of Administration of Nueces County for the District Courts implementing the provisions of S.B. 7.  At a duly convened meeting of the District Judges of Nueces County Texas held on  September 20, 2017, said Judges by majority vote recorded in the minutes of the meeting amended Local Rules of Administration of Nueces County pursuant to Article 26.05 et. seq. of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.   At a duly convened meeting of the District Judges of Nueces County Texas held on  August 21, 2019, said Judges by majority vote recorded in the minutes of the meeting amended Local Rules of Administration of Nueces County pursuant to Article 26.05 et. seq. of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.   At a duly convened meeting of the District Judges of Nueces County Texas held on  October 29,  2020, said Judges by majority vote recorded in the minutes of the meeting amended Local Rules of Administration of Nueces County pursuant to Article 26.05 et. seq. of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  At a duly convened meeting of the District Judges of Nueces County, Texas held on July 21, 2021, said Judges by majority vote recorded in the minutes of the meetng amended Local Rules of Administration of Nueces County pursuant to Article 26.05 et. seq. of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  At a duly convened meeting of the District Judges of Nueces County, Texas held on May 2, 2023 said Judges by majority vote recorded in the minutes of the meetng amended Local Rules of Administration of Nueces County pursuant to Article 26.05 et. seq. of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. 

1.    Arresting Officer Responsibilities

                              a.            The arresting officer, or the person having custody of the arrestee, shall ensure that every arrestee shall be brought before a magistrate without unnecessary delay, but not later than 48 hours after the person is arrested. 

                              b.            Unless arrested pursuant to an arrest warrant, bench warrant, capias, or other order of a magistrate or judge, necessary forms establishing probable cause must be completed and filed at the time an arrestee is booked into jail for any felony or misdemeanor punishable by incarceration.

                               c.            Release of defendants arrested without warrant

1.      A person arrested for a misdemeanor without a warrant and who is detained in jail must be released not later than the 24th hour after arrest, on a Personal Recognizance Bond with reasonable conditions to be set by the Magistrate, if a magistrate has not determined that probable cause exists to believe that the person committed the offense. 

2.      A person arrested for a felony without a warrant and who is detained in jail must be released not later than the 48th hour after arrest, on a bond in accordance with Senate Bill 6, if a magistrate has not determined that probable cause exists to believe that the person committed the offense. 

3.      If requested by the state, a magistrate may postpone the release of the defendant for not more than 72 hours after the defendant's arrest if a probable cause determination has not been made, in compliance with the procedure set forth in Article 17.033, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.     Magistrate Duties

                                a            At the Magistrate’s hearing, the magistrate should determine if accused can speak and understand English, or if the defendant is deaf.  The Magistrate shall provide an interpreter as soon as practical. 

                                b.          After making such determination, the Magistrate shall, in an appropriate manner consistent with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 38.30 and 38.31, do the following:

c.     If Magistrate determines Defendant is not a U.S. citizen, notify the Consulate of their country, if requested by Defendant.

1.      Advise the accused of the accusation against him/her and any affidavit filed therewith;

2.      Admonish the accused of:

a.       The right to retain counsel;

b.      The right to remain silent;

c.       The right to have an attorney present during any interview with peace officers or attorneys representing the state;

d.      The right to terminate an interview at any time;

e.       The right not to make a statement and that any statement made by the accused may be used against him/her; and

f.       The right to an examining trial.

3.      Inform the accused of the right to appointed counsel if the person cannot afford counsel and the procedures for requesting appointment of counsel.

4.      Inquire as to whether accused is requesting that counsel be appointed.

5.      Provide accused persons requesting appointed counsel with necessary forms for requesting appointment of counsel and ensure that reasonable assistance in completing required forms is provided to the accused at the time of the magistrate’s hearing.

6.      If the magistrate has reason to believe the accused is not mentally competent, the magistrate shall enter a request for counsel on behalf of the accused. Such a request will alert the appointing authority that counsel competent to represent mentally ill persons should be appointed.

                            7.         In cases where the individual was arrested without an arrest warrant, bench warrant, capias, or other order of magistrate or judge, the Magistrate shall determine if there is probable cause to believe the person committed the offense.

1.      If probable cause has not been determined by a magistrate:

a.       A person arrested for a misdemeanor must be released on a Personal Recognizance Bond with reasonable conditions to be set by the Magistrate, not later than 24 hours after the person's arrest.

b.      A person arrested for a felony must be released on a bond pursuant to S.B. 6 and approved by the Magistrate, not later than 48 hours after the person’s arrest.

c.       If requested by the state, the magistrate may postpone the release of the defendant for not more than 72 hours after the defendant's arrest, in compliance with the procedure set forth in Article 17.033, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

                          8.            The Magistrate shall set the amount of bail and any conditions of bond for the accused, if bail is allowed by law and has not been set by the court or magistrate issuing a warrant.

                         9.            The Magistrate shall record the following:

a.      The date and time the accused was arrested and the date and time when he/she was brought before the magistrate.

b.      Whether the magistrate informed the accused of the right to request appointment of counsel and asked the accused whether he/she wants to request counsel.

c.      Whether the accused requested appointment of counsel.

10.            If the magistrate is not authorized to appoint counsel and if the accused requests appointment of counsel, the magistrate shall transmit or cause to be transmitted the magistrate form and any other forms requesting appointment of counsel to  the judges' designee, the Indigent Defense Coordinator(s) (the appointing authority). The forms requesting appointment of counsel shall be transmitted without unnecessary delay, but not later than 24 hours after the person arrested requests appointment of counsel.

                           11.           The Indigent Defense Coordinator(s) shall make a determination of indigency and appoint counsel if the defendant is indigent within three working days unless the County has a U.S. Census population over 250,000, in which case counsel shall be appointed within one working day. 

                           12.            If a request for counsel was made at magistration, the appointing authority shall forward the magistrate form, and any other forms requesting appointment of counsel, to the appropriate clerk to be put into the case file.

     14.     For a person arrested on an out-of-county warrant, the magistrate must ask if the person wants to request counsel, inform the person of the procedures for requesting counsel, and ensure the person is provided reasonable assistance in completing the necessary forms for requesting counsel in the county issuing the warrant.

    15.  Requests for counsel made by person arrested on out-of-county warrants must be transmitted to the appointing authority issuing the warrant within 24 hours of the request being made.

 

 

 

 

 

3.    Definitions, as used in this rule:

                            a.            “Indigent” means a person who is not financially able to employ counsel.

                            b.            “Net household income” means all income of the accused and spousal income actually available to the accused. Such income shall include: take-home wages and salary (gross income earned minus those deductions required by law or as a condition of employment); net self-employment income (gross income minus business expenses, and those deductions required by law or as a condition of operating the business); regular payments from a governmental income maintenance program, alimony, child support, public or private pensions, or annuities; and income from dividends, interest, rents, royalties, or periodic receipts from estates or trusts. Seasonal or temporary income shall be considered on an annualized basis, averaged together with periods in which the accused has no income or lesser income.

                            c.            “Household” means all individuals who are actually dependent on the accused for financial support.

                            d.            “The cost of obtaining competent private legal representation” includes the reasonable cost of support services such as investigators and expert witnesses as necessary and appropriate given the nature of the case.

4.     Eligibility for Appointment

                                a.            An accused is presumed indigent if any of the following conditions or factors are present:

1.      At the time of requesting appointed counsel, the accused or accused’s dependents are eligible to receive food stamps, Medicaid, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Supplemental Security Income, or public housing;

2.      The accused’s net household income does not exceed  125 % of the Poverty Guidelines as revised annually by the United States Department of Health and Human Services and published in the Federal Register; or

3.      The accused is currently serving a sentence in a correctional institution, is currently residing in a public mental health facility, or is subject to a proceeding in which admission or commitment to such a mental health facility is sought.

b.              An accused who does not meet any of the standards above shall nevertheless be considered indigent if the accused is unable to retain private counsel without substantial hardship to the accused or the accused’s dependents. In considering if obtaining private counsel will create a substantial hardship, the appointing authority shall take into account:

1.      the nature of the criminal charge(s),

2.      anticipated complexity of the defense,

3.      the estimated cost of obtaining competent private legal representation for the matter(s) charged;

4.      the amount needed for the support of the accused and the accused’s dependents; 

5.      accused’s income,

6.      source of income,

7.      assets and property owned,

8.      outstanding obligations,

9.      necessary expenses,

10.  the number and ages of dependents, and

11.  spousal income that is available to the accused.

c.            Factors NOT to be considered in determining indigence:

1.      The accused’s posting of bail or ability to post bail may not be considered in determining whether the accused is indigent.

2.      The resources available to friends or relatives of the accused may not be considered in determining whether the accused is indigent.

d.    Only the accused's financial circumstances as measured by the financial standards stated in this rule shall be used as the basis for determining indigence.

5.     Indigence Proceedings:

                                a.            The appointing authority can require the accused to respond to questions about the accused’s financial status, produce documentation supporting financial information provided, and/or order a court official to verify financial information provided.

                              b.            Information gathered for determining indigence, both in the affidavit of indigence and through oral examination, may not be for any purpose other than:

1.      Determining if accused is (or is not) indigent; or

2.      Impeaching direct testimony of accused regarding the accused’s indigence.

                            c.            A request by the appointing authority for additional information, documentation, and/or verification cannot delay appointment of counsel beyond the timelines specified in Parts I and IV of these rules and contained in Code of Criminal Procedure article 1.051.

                            d.            An accused determined to be indigent is presumed to remain indigent for the remainder of the case unless a material change in the accused’s financial circumstances occurs.

1.      An accused’s status as indigent or not indigent may be reviewed in a formal hearing at any stage of court proceedings, on a motion for reconsideration by the accused, the accused’s attorney, or the attorney representing the state. The accused’s indigent status will be presumed not to have changed. The presumption can be rebutted in the review proceedings based on the following:

a.       Evidence of a material change in the accused’s financial circumstances, as a result of which the accused does not meet any of the standards for indigence contained in these rules; or

b.      Additional information regarding the accused’s financial circumstances that shows that the accused does not meet any of the standards for indigence contained in these rules.

2.      If an accused previously determined to be indigent is subsequently determined not to be indigent, the attorney shall be compensated by the county according to the fee schedule for hours reasonably expended on the case.

                              e.            If the court determines that a defendant has financial resources that enable him to offset in part or in whole the costs of the legal services provided, including any expenses and costs, the court shall order the defendant to pay during the pendency of the charges or, if convicted, as court costs the amount that it finds the defendant is able to pay.

6.  Eligibility for Appointments:

For the Public Defender's Office (PDO):

The PDO shall be eligible to receive appointments in accordance with the Chief Public Defender's determination of specific attorney qualifications, standards of practice, and caseload standards.  The Chief Public Defender will inform the appointing authority which categories of cases the office is eligible to accept.

For Attorneys not employed by the PDO and seeking appointments:

a. The form of Application shall be in the form promulgated by the District Court Judges.  Attorneys seeking criminal appointments must complete Application and submit it to the Court Administrator.  Once approved, it is not necessary for an attorney to submit an application annually.  A new application may be submitted if an attorney wishes to be evaluated and qualified by the District Court Judges for an additional/different level of case representation.

b. The form shall inquire about an applicant's biographical, education, licensing, certification, continuing education, trial experience, disciplinary history and other pertinent data.

c. The form shall also inquire whether the application is for all cases or limited to misdemeanors only; for both misdemeanors and felonies; community supervision revocation motions only; for jury trials; for mental competency proceedings; for appeals only; for post-conviction proceedings, including writ of habeas corpus; motions for DNA testing, and such other proceedings as determined by the Courts.

7. Responsibilities of Appointed Counsel:

a. "Lead counsel" means the attorney in charge of the case.

b. Each appointed attorney or the PDO shall make reasonable efforts to contact the Defendant within 24 hours of any appointment pursuant to Section j of the Act and to interview the defendant as soon as practicable. The appointed attorney or the PDO who accepts an appointment shall represent the defendant until charges are dismissed, the defendant is acquitted, the appeals are exhausted, or the attorney is relieved of his duties by the Court, or replaced by other counsel after a finding of good cause on the record. A majority of the Judges of the District may remove from consideration the appointment of an attorney who intentionally or repeatedly violates subsection (j)(1) of Article 26.04 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, or the disciplinary rules.

8. Standard Guidelines:

For the Public Defender's Office:

The Chief Public Defender shall establish and maintain the specific attorney qualifications, standards of practice, and caseload standards for all PDO attorneys providing representation to people accused of criminal offenses in Nueces County.

For Attorneys not employed by the PDO:

a.   An attorney must meet the following requirements during each twelve month reporting period or be currently certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization unless exempt by the Texas State Bar.

1. Earned 9 or more hours per year of continuing legal education in criminal law unless exempt.

2. At least 3 of the CLE hours required by this section muist be from presentations sponsored by the Board of Judges and/or the PDO on topic requested by the Board of Judges.

3. Be in good standing with the State Bar of Texas;

b.   An attorney must disclose in the application that, within the previous three years;

1. He was the subject of a final disciplinary action by the Commission for Lawyer Discipline, and/or,

2. He was the subject of a finding that he rendered ineffective assistance of counsel in a criminal case, and,

3. In either event, may include an explanation of such action or finding.

c.   An attorney must complete a certification course approved by the local judiciary as the Board of Judges deem necessary.

d.   Attorneys do not need to re-apply for lists they are already on, but may apply for additional lists if they have met the qualifications.

e.  The following standards apply to each attorney who is appointed to represent a defendant accused of a felony.

            1.         An attorney must meet the general qualifications.   

            2.         An attorney must have practiced criminal law on a regular basis for a minimum of four years and must have tried at least four felony cases as first chair (“lead counsel”) to juries in the preceding ten years in order to qualify for 1^st degree felony cases; must have tried at least two cases as first chair (“lead counsel”) to juries in the preceding ten years in order to qualify for 2^nd degree felony cases; and must have tried at least three cases  (either felony or misdemeanor or a combination of both) in order to qualify for 3^rd degree felony cases.

f.   An attorney shall submit by October 15th each year a statement that describes the percentage of the attorney's practice time that was dedicated to work based on appointments accepted in this county for adult criminal cases and juvenile delinquency cases for the prior 12 months that begins on October 1 and ends on September 30.  The report must be submitted through the online form to the Texas Indigent Defense Commission.  If an attorney does not submit a report, that attorney will be removed from the appointment list until the attorney complies with or shows good cause for not complying.  If an attorney refuses to comply there upon, the attorney may be sanctioned as deemed by the Judges or removed from the list until compliant.

9. If it is determined that the Defendant is indigent:

a.  For those Courts which have authorized the Magistrate to appoint counsel, the Magistrate shall appoint counsel not later than 24 hours after the Defendant requests appointment of counsel.  Counsel shall be appointed from the assigned Court's approved appointment list.

b. Persons out of custody: Counsel must be appointed at defendant's first court appearance or when adversarial judicial proceedings are initiated, whichever comes first.

c. Advise unrepresented defendants of the right to counsel and procedures for obtaining counsel.

d. Person arrested in other counties on local warrants must be appointed counsel within 1 working day of receipt of the request in counties with a population of 250,000 or more and within 3 working days of receipt of the request in counties under 250,000.

e. Persons arrested on out-of-county warrants must be appointed counsel if the person has not been transferred or released to the custody of the county issuing the warrant before the 11th day after the date of the arrest.

f. Procedures for defendants to obtain the necessary forms to request counsel and to submit these forms to the appointing authority at any time after the initiation of adversary judicial proceedings.

g. If a defendant wishes to request counsel prior to the initial appearance, the forms required to request counsel may be obtained at the Texas Indigent Defense Commission’s website at http://tidc.tamu.edu/public.net/ or from the Nueces County Magistrates.   The defendant may submit these forms to the Nueces County Magistrates or the Judge to which his/her case is assigned.  The court will rule on all requests for counsel submitted in this manner.

 

 

 

 

10.  Appointment Process

PDO Attorney Assignment Process

     a.   The Public Defender's Office shall be eligible to receive appointments within the County's electronic appointment system and shall have priority for appointments consistent with its representation capacity in accordance with article 26.04(a) and (f) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

     b.   The PDO, through the Chief Public Defender, will determine its representation capacity consistent with TCCP Article 26.044, PDO Practices & Policies, and the TIDC Statement of Grant Award.

     c.   Upon accepting an appointment, the Chief Public Defender, or their designee, shall be responsible for assignments to individual PDO attorneys, taking into consideration the experience, skills and training of all attorneys, individual and office-wide caseloads, and any other consideration relevant to an attorney's duty to provide competent, diligent, and zealous advocacy.

     d.   The PDO may not accept an apointment under Article 26.04(f) if : (1) a conflict of interest exists that has not been waived by the client; (2) the PDO has sufficient resources to provide adequate representation for the defendant; (3) the PDO is incapable of providing representation for the defendant in accordance with the rules of professional conduct; (4) the acceptance of the appointment would violate the maximum allowable caseloads established at the PDO; and (5) the PDO shows other good cause for not accepting the appointment.

Attorney Assignment Process other than PDO:
 

         a.  Where the PDO is not appointed, the appointing authority will identify which attorney lists, discussed in the Section 6 (attorney qualifications), is most appropriate based on the accusations against the defendant and will appoint the attorney whose name is first on the list,  if not, the Magistrate may consider the next five attorneys on the list if an attorney is appropriate, unless the court makes a finding of good cause on the record for appointing an attorney out of order. Good cause may include:

                                1.            The defendant requesting counsel does not understand English, in which case the judge will appoint the lawyer whose name appears next in order and speaks the client's language, if one is available;

                              2.            The defendant has an attorney already appointed on a prior pending or concluded matter. The same attorney will be appointed to the new matter, unless the attorney is not on the list for the type of 

                            offense involved in the current case; or

                            3.            Other good cause exists for varying from the list.

b.     Once appointed, an attorney’s name will be moved to the bottom of the appointment list. An attorney who is not appointed in the order in which the attorney’s name appears on the list shall remain next in order on the list.

c.     Removal from Appointments:

                                1.            An attorney may be sanctioned or removed from one or more of the public appointment lists by vote of a majority of the criminal district judges for any of the following reasons:

a.      Whenever the judges determine that the attorney no longer meets the objective qualifications for that list or is not fully competent to adequately handle the category of cases associated with that list.  The judges, in their discretion, may remove an attorney from one or more lists, while continuing to approve the attorney for lists;  

b.      When the attorney intentionally or repeatedly violates the requirement that the attorney make every reasonable effort to contact the defendant not later than the end of the first working day after the date on which attorney is appointed and to interview the defendant as soon as practicable after the attorney is appointed;  

c.      When, after a hearing, it is shown that the attorney submitted false information or misrepresented any information on the Application for Court Appointments;

d.      When, after a hearing, it is shown that the attorney submitted a claim for legal services not performed by the attorney;

e.      When, after a hearing, it is shown that the attorney requested and/or received any money or anything else of value for representing the accused, other than what is paid or anticipated to be paid to them by the county, without approval from the court in writing;

f.      When an attorney has been arrested, or formally charged for any offense, excluding traffic tickets.  The notification to the Board of Judges must be done by the end of the first business day after the arrest or formal charge; 

g.      When an attorney has been convicted or received deferred adjudication for any offense or formally charged for any offense, excluding traffic tickets;

h.     When an attorney fails to disclose to the Board of Judges that he/she has been arrested or formally charged for any offense, excluding traffic tickets;

i.     When, after a hearing, it is shown by credible evidence that the attorney has an alcohol or substance abuse problem and has failed to address it;

j.     When an attorney fails to be in good standing with the State Bar of Texas;

k.     When an attorney fails to submit by October 15th each year a statement that describes the percentage of the attorney's practice time that was dedicated to work based on appointments accepted in this county for adult criminal cases and juvenile delinquency cases for the prior 12 months that begins October 1 and ends September 30.  The report must be submitted through the online form to the Texas Indigent Defense Commission;

l.     When an attorney fails to submit proof of the required 9 hours of the CLE in criminal law to the Board of Judges by the last day of the calendar year.  An attorney will not be appointed to any criminal cases until proof of CLE compliance is tendered to the Board of Judges;

m.    When an attorney violates rules of professional conduct;

n.     When an attorney voluntarily removes himself from the appointment list;

o.     When an attorney is excessively tardy or excessively fails to appear in court;

p.     Any judge, for good cause, may raise an issue regarding representation by an attorney or attorney misconduct at a monthly Board of Judges meeting.  Specific and timely allegations must form the basis of the complaint; and

q.     For good cause at the discretion of a majority of the district courts hearing criminal cases.

                              2.       The possible sanctions for an attorney violating any of the rules in the above subsection include:

                         a.    Removal from the appointment list(s);

                        b.     Temporary removal from the appointment list(s);

                        c.     Requirement of additional CLE;

                        d.    Demotion of the attorney to a lower appointment list;

                        e.    Written reprimand signed by the Presiding Judge; or 

                        f.     No action.

                3.     Reinstatement of Appointment Lists

                        a.     An attorney who was removed from the appointment list for non-completion of the required CLE hours may be immediately reinstated upon providing proof that the attorney has completed the required hours so long as the attorney otherwise meets the other qualifications under this Plan.

                        b.     An attorney who has been removed from the appointment list for any other reason and who wishes to be reinstated must apply through the original application process.  

                 4.     Appointment of Replacement Counsel - Whenever appointed counsel is removed under this section, replacement counsel shall immediately be selected and appointed in accordance with the procedures described in this plan.

d.  Annual review of list of qualified attorneys.

The District Judges will conduct an annual review of the quality of the representation of the attorneys on the court appointed list at the first Board of Judges meeting of each year, said review to be approved by the majority of the Judges.

11. Compensation for Counsel other than those employed by the PDO:

Attorneys not employed by the Nueces County Public Defender's Office shall receive compensation according to the following schedule:

Flat Fees for the following:

Withdrawal/Substitution    $100.00        

No Charge                          $200.00

Dismissal/Divert                $300.00                    

MTR                                   $450.00

SJF                                      $500.00

3RD                                    $550.00

2ND                                    $750.00

1ST                                     $900.00 

Capital/Death                       Must be itemized

Capital/non-Death                Must be itemized

Appeal                                 $100.00 - $120.00 per hour   

Attorney requesting attorney's fees in lieu of the flat fee for exception circumstances and described in attached and itemized documentation to support such request.

For Jury Trials:

In Court Hours                  $120.00 an hour

Out of Court Hours           $80.00  an hour                                 

Reimbursable expenses with prior approval (attach receipts)

Capital and Non-Capital  - Attorney to itemize hours for in court and out of court hours.                    

                                                                                             
a. A court may vary from the foregoing schedule to fairly compensate counsel in a particular case.

b. No payment shall be made until the judge approves payment after submission of attorney fee voucher.

c. If judge disapproves the requested amount of payment, the judge shall make written findings stating the amount that the judge approves and each reason for approving an amount different from the requested amount. An attorney whose request for payment is disapproved or not acted on within 60 days of submission may appeal the disapproval or failure to act by filing a motion with the presiding judge of the administrative judicial region.

d. Expenses incurred without prior approval may not be reimbursed unless it is clear that expenses are reasonably necessary and reasonably incurred.

12. Fee Application; Documentation:

a. Except for good cause Counsel requesting payment must submit a written fee application in the form promulgated by the Court. The application must have attached to it any documentation to support expenses.

1.   Court approved investigators to submit separate time sheets.  Investigators fee not to exceed $50.00 per hour.  Must have prior approval by Court for investigator.

b. A counsel appointed to represent a defendant in a criminal proceeding shall be paid a reasonable attorney's fee for performing the following services based on the time and labor required, the complexity of the case, and the experience and ability of appointed counsel:

1. the time spent in court making an appearance on behalf of the defendant as evidenced by docket entry,

2. the time spent in trial,

3. the time spent in a proceeding in which sworn oral testimony is elicited,

4. the reasonable and necessary time spent out of court on the case, supported by documentation.

5. the time spent for the preparation of an appellate brief and presentation of oral argument to a Court of Appeals or the Court of Criminal Appeals; or

6. the time spent for the preparation of a motion for rehearing, all of which shall be subject to the discretion of the Court.

   Fee applications submitted for approval in lieu of the flat fee must be itemized in .01 hour increments, describing in detail the specific services provided and the amount of time spent on each of the specific services. 

   

13. Arraignment shall be set by a standing order of each court of the District Courts promptly after a Defendant is indicted.

14. Magistrate Court

a. The Magistrate may dispose of cases by accepting pleas of guilty or nolo contendre or pleas of true on Motions to Revoke as well as other proceedings as requested by District Judges.

b. A probable cause finding by the Magistrate does not preclude an examining trial.

15. Opt Out Rule

A District Court may opt out of any or all of the provisions of these Rules and may develop its own procedures that comply with the law.

16. Repeal of Conflicting Rules:

Upon the effective date of these Rules, all prior District Court Local Administrative Rules, Orders, practices and/or procedures in conflict with these Rules are repealed.

17. Determination of Repeal

In the event that a question arises regarding the repeal of a prior Rule, Order, practice and/or procedure, the Judges of the District Courts shall meet and decide by majority vote whether the prior Rule, Order, practice and/or procedure is repealed.

18. Effective date

These Rules are effective as amended on May 2, 2023 and effective immediately.

 

Nueces District Court Affidavit of Indigence.pdf (5/4/2023 2:28:24 PM) view
Nueces District Court Attorney Application for Appointment.pdf (10/25/2021 12:19:48 PM) view
Nueces District Court Attorney Fee Schedule.pdf (5/4/2023 2:36:59 PM) view
Nueces District Court Attorney Fee Voucher- Capital Cases.pdf (5/1/2017 10:57:22 AM) view
Nueces District Court Attorney Fee Voucher.pdf (7/3/2023 12:26:45 PM) view
Nueces District Court Investigator Fee Voucher.pdf (9/5/2019 10:05:59 AM) view
Nueces District Court Magistrates Warning Form.pdf (1/21/2010 8:55:07 AM) view
Nueces District Court Nueces District Court Affidavit of Indigence - Spanish.pdf (5/4/2023 2:38:53 PM) view
Nueces District Court Nueces District Court Investigaor fee Voucher.docx (10/11/2019 7:47:35 AM) view
Nueces District Court Observation of Person Suspected of Having Mental Illness or Mental Retardation.pdf (10/23/2015 10:34:19 AM) view
Nueces District Court Record of Proceedings Pursuant to Art. 15.17 Code of Criminal Proceedings.pdf (10/23/2015 10:31:49 AM) view
Nueces District Court ROSTER-MENTALILLNESS-PRBONDS.pdf (1/21/2010 9:43:49 AM) view
Nueces District Court Waiver of Counsel.pdf (1/21/2010 9:22:11 AM) view